How “Direct Primary Care” Works For Patients, Providers, And Payers

By: bitcoin ethereum news|2025/05/09 01:30:02
0
Share
copy
The number of Direct Primary Care practices has grown from about 500 in 2015 to more than 1,400 today. getty In my endless quest for delivery models that provide patients with easy access to high-quality and affordable primary care, I am driving through the Austin, TX suburb of Leander looking for a clinic operated by Frontier Direct Care . The first thing I notice is that it’s very hard to find. Waze directs me to its address in a small strip center, but my destination appears to be occupied by a bar & grill. I nervously call Frontier’s founder and CEO, Bibb Beale, who has agreed to meet me there and show me around. Fortunately, he picks up and assures me that the clinic is there, just behind the bar & grill. Checking again, I find the inconspicuous clinic, which has no external signage. It says “Frontier Direct Care” in small letters on one of the double-entry doors and “Leander ISD” on the other. The second remarkable thing I notice, walking in, is that there is no receptionist and no patients in the attractive but very quiet waiting room. Bibb explains that the reason for this is that the clinic is entirely dedicated to Leander Independent School District (ISD) employees (thus there is no need for it to be in a more visible retail location), and that approximately 13% of the 6,400 employees covered by their health plans have opted for this health benefit thus far—even though the clinic only opened a few months ago. Beale says that the clinic has eight physicians and advanced practice providers, so each provider would have a maximum of 800 patients in their panel (about 100 today) if all of Leander ISD’s covered employees enrolled. Compare this to 1,500-2,500 patients in most traditional primary care practice panels. Frontier patients make in-person appointments online (they also initiate virtual appointments), and their dedicated provider meets them when they arrive, so no receptionist is required. “How is it possible to provide this level of white glove care?” I ask. He tells me that it is because they don’t take insurance or the related cost of processing claims, which are estimated to consume 10-15% of all healthcare-related expenses. Instead, they contract directly with Leander ISD (and other employers, and in other markets), which pays them a monthly per-employee fee to provide essentially unlimited primary care services to their employees who don’t have to worry about deductibles, co-pays, coinsurance, and other out-of-pocket costs. The result is that patient satisfaction is very high (94 Net Promoter Score); providers like it because they have small patient panels, can spend more time with their patients, and don’t have to spend any time on insurance-related administrative tasks (making it easy to recruit and retain, which is a huge benefit given widespread healthcare staffing challenges); and Leander ISD likes it because they have satisfied employees who are getting better and less expensive healthcare. DPC Profile This is the still-young but rapidly growing Direct Primary Care (DPC) model. It is different from also fast-growing “Concierge” practices, in which providers shrink their patient panels and charge annual fees for preferential access but still largely depend on insurance reimbursements. The number of DPC practices has grown from about 500 in 2015 to more than 1,400 today, and annual membership growth—including both individual and employer-sponsored memberships—is estimated to be 30-40%. According to a 2024 study by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), about 9% of their members are practicing in a DPC today. 84 percent of DPC practices don’t accept any form of insurance; monthly membership fees average $50-$100 for individuals and $100 or more for families; and two-thirds of DPC practices participate in employer-based contracts (while Frontier’s Leander clinic is dedicated to a single client, they and other DPC providers frequently have multiple clients’ employees sharing a clinic). 98 percent of the AAFP study physician respondents said they felt that the quality of care provided to patients was better in a DPC clinic than in conventional practices, and overwhelming numbers of the respondents felt that practicing in a DPC clinic improved professional and personal satisfaction (97%), their ability to practice medicine (94%), and their patient relationships (94%). How DPC Saves Money The value proposition for employees, patients, and providers is not hard to understand, but how does DPC save money for employers in an era when employee benefit costs have been rising at a 5-6% rate and frequently are the fastest-growing line items in employer budgets? First, because DPC provides comprehensive primary care (the absence of which has been shown to be a key driver of healthcare costs) with a focus on preventive care, which frequently is not a priority for providers who accept insurance because insurance generally does not reimburse adequately for it. In any case, many providers don’t have time to deliver preventive care because they are running so hard with large patient panels to maximize visit volume in order to be financially viable. In addition, since patients being treated in DPC practices don’t have to worry about deductibles, co-pays, and coinsurance, they are less likely to delay or skip important visits related to chronic conditions and other health issues that can turn into serious and expensive medical problems if not caught early and managed effectively. Research also shows that DPC patients are less likely to use more expensive forms of care, including ERs and specialists. Furthermore, the healthier employees that DPC enables through regular care from a dedicated and unhurried provider are more likely to be productive (increased presenteeism) and less likely to skip work (reduced absenteeism). Their ability to make appointments with little or no waiting increases productivity by reducing time away from worksites. Finally, offering DPC can be a differentiator in a tight labor market, and satisfied employees are less likely to leave their employers, reducing costly turnover. Beyond Primary Care Employees who elect DPC for their primary care frequently couple it with High-Deductible Health Plans and other forms of insurance, so they are covered in case they need more complex care and/or high-cost drugs. However, some DPC providers—including Frontier—also help patients and their employers in these areas . Many DPC providers negotiate directly with prescription drug manufacturers and wholesalers, or work with Amazon Pharmacy, Good Rx, and other third parties to give their patients access to generic and other common medications at prices that are significantly less than what they would pay at retail pharmacies. Generic antibiotics and steroids, for example, sometimes cost DPC patients $5.00, or even less, and are dispensed at their clinics or shipped directly to their homes. DPC providers also negotiate discounted rates with local pharmacies, labs, and imaging centers as part of bundled service agreements. In addition, Frontier and other DPC providers also negotiate cash discounts for high-cost specialty drugs, specialist care, and hospital-based acute care. If these prices are less than what their employer clients would otherwise expect to pay through a Pharmacy Benefit Manager (PBM) or insurance company-operated Third-Party Administrator (TPA), clients reimburse their DPC partners outside of monthly fee arrangements, including small mark-ups. This is yet another way DPC providers help employers save money while providing access to high-quality care for their employees. It was hard to find Frontier’s Direct Primary Care clinic, but I’m glad I did. No single healthcare delivery model works for everyone, but increasing access to primary care is critical to improving population health and reducing costs, and it’s hard to find models that work for patients, providers, and payers. Direct Primary Care qualifies in this regard, and it deserves an increasingly prominent role in our nation’s healthcare delivery system. Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbooksauthors/2025/05/08/how-direct-primary-care-works-for-patients-providers-and-payers/

You may also like

1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars

Liquidity saved Polkadot's life.

After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?

The US has taken away Iran’s most important card, but has also lost the path to ending the war

Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions

The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.


There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."


Question One: Is this encryption the same as Signal's encryption?


No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.


In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.


X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.


This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.


The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.


The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.


After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."


From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.


In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.



As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."


Issue 2: Does Grok know what you're messaging in private?


Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.


For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.


This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.


There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."


Issue 3: Why is there no Android version?


X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.


In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.



WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.


X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.


These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.


Elon Musk's "Super App"


This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.



X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.


Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.


The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.


X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.


The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.


Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?

Noise is planning to launch its mainnet on Base in the coming months, at which point the platform will be open to everyone and support real-money trading.

Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x

The longer you use it, the smarter it gets, what makes Hermes, where developers have migrated to, special?

Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames

When saving humanity becomes the sole criterion, action boundaries start to blur

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more