Protect Developers or Weaken Oversight? Judiciary Committee Strongly Opposes Section 604 of the CLARITY Act
BlockBeats News, January 17th, the chairman of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee stated in a letter to the Senate Banking Committee that the "Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act" would weaken federal fund transfer regulation and should not be included in cryptocurrency market structure legislation.
The Judiciary Committee's Republican chairman, Chuck Grassley, and chief Democratic member, Dick Durbin, wrote in the letter that Section 604 of the Banking Committee's market structure bill - aimed at protecting software developers from criminal liability for third-party misuse of their products - would "weaken" federal law regarding unlicensed money transmission. "The Senate Judiciary Committee (which has jurisdiction over Title 18 of the U.S. Code) was not consulted, nor was it afforded the opportunity for advance substantive consideration of the proposed changes."
The letter cited the case of the Department of Justice's prosecution of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm, stating that the case demonstrated that the prosecuting party had sufficiently argued the importance of existing regulations holding parties to unlicensed money transmission accountable. This letter is another blow to the market structure bill, with the Senate Banking Committee originally scheduled to debate and vote on the bill on Thursday but canceling the agenda on Wednesday night in the face of increasingly strong opposition.
If the provision is retained in the bill, the Judiciary Committee (responsible for legal matters) would need to sign off as the third committee on the overall package, and this latest controversy suggests that the legislative process may become even more complicated. DeFi advocates insist that without these specific protection provisions, they may withdraw their support, signaling another difficult deadlock.
The letter emphasized: "Therefore, we urge the committee to reject any proposed provisions that would weaken the government's ability to hold parties accountable for unlicensed money transmission, including Section 604."
You may also like

When AI Takes Over the 'Shopping Journey,' How Much Time Does PayPal Have Left?

Bloomberg: Aid Turkey Freeze $1 Billion Assets, Tether Remakes Compliance Boundary

Polymarket vs. Kalshi: The Full Meme War Timeline

Consensus Check: What Consensus Was Born at the 2026 First Conference?

Resigned in Less Than a Year of Taking Office, Why Did Yet Another Key Figure at the Ethereum Foundation Depart?

Russian-Ukrainian War Prediction Market Analysis Report

Ethereum Foundation Executive Director Resigns, Coinbase Rating Downgrade: What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

Who's at the CFTC Table? A Rebalancing of American Fintech Discourse
AI Trading vs Human Crypto Traders: $10,000 Live Trading Battle Results in Munich, Germany (WEEX Hackathon 2026)
Discover how AI trading outperformed human traders in WEEX's live Munich showdown. Learn 3 key strategies from the battle and why AI is changing crypto trading.
Elon Musk's X Money vs. Crypto's Synthetic Dollars: Who Wins the Future of Money?
How do Synthetic Dollars work? This guide explains their strategies, benefits over traditional stablecoins like USDT, and risks every crypto trader must know.

The Israeli military is hunting a mole on Polymarket

Q4 $667M Net Loss: Coinbase Earnings Report Foreshadows Challenging 2026 for Crypto Industry?

BlackRock Buying UNI, What's the Catch?

Lost in Hong Kong

Gold Plunges Over 4%, Silver Crashes 11%, Stock Market Plummet Triggers Precious Metals Algorithmic Selling Pressure?

Coinbase and Solana make successive moves, Agent economy to become the next big narrative

Aave DAO Wins, But the Game Is Not Over
