Why Solana Projects Should Consider Shibarium, According to Shiba Inu Insider

By: coin central|2025/05/09 01:45:02
0
Share
copy
TLDRSolana projects can expand to Shibarium by launching native tokens and building utilityShibarium offers relief from Solana’s outages, congestion, and ecosystem isolationWHY Combinator and the SHIB Army give projects tools, users, and liquidity without starting from scratch.Shibarium continues to expand its ecosystem with integrations with Chainlink and PolygonAs Solana projects face mounting challenges in an increasingly competitive blockchain landscape, LUCIE, the lead marketing strategist for Shib Ecosystem has outlined a bold strategy to overcome these obstacles. On Thursday, Lucie shared her vision for cross-chain collaboration, suggesting that Solana-based applications could thrive by expanding to Shibarium, even without direct bridging infrastructure.Why Solana Projects Should Expand to Shibarium (Even Without a Bridge)There’s no direct Solana-to-Shibarium bridge yet—but that doesn’t stop visionary projects like Shy on Sol from planting flags in both worlds.Here’s how and why Solana projects can still enter Shibarium:1.... pic.twitter.com/bHR3sCIWAq— LUCIE (@LucieSHIB) May 8, 2025A New Kind of Expansion—Not Just MigrationSolana, while celebrated for its transaction speed and low fees, has struggled with periodic network outages and congestion issues over the past year. These reliability concerns have left some projects vulnerable to user frustration and limited growth. Additionally, Solana’s somewhat isolated ecosystem has restricted access to the vast user bases available on Ethereum-compatible chains.“Think of it as a cross-chain expansion, not just a migration,” Lucie explained, suggesting that Shibarium could complement rather than replace Solana’s functionality. This approach acknowledges Solana’s technical strengths while addressing its ecosystem limitations.The centralization critique often leveled at Solana presents another challenge that Shibarium expansion could help mitigate. By diversifying across networks, projects can reduce dependency on any single blockchain’s health and governance decisions. Lucie’s guidance seems tailored to projects seeking greater resilience against network-specific risks.Shibarium Offers a Full-Stack EcosystemShibarium’s layer-2 solution offers a potential remedy to several Solana pain points. Built on Ethereum, it provides access to the largest smart contract ecosystem while maintaining relatively low fees through its scaling technology. For Solana projects struggling with limited cross-chain interoperability, Shibarium represents a strategic gateway to the broader Ethereum universe.“Tap Into the Combinator Ecosystem,” Lucie advised, highlighting Shibarium’s WHY Combinator, which provides “support for dApps, games, AI tools, and community-driven projects.”This ready-made infrastructure addresses the resource constraints faced by many Solana developers who lack the capital or connections to build robust support systems independently.Market volatility has also challenged Solana projects seeking stable user growth. Shibarium offers access to the notoriously passionate SHIB Army, a community known for its loyalty and engagement. “The SHIB army is ready,” Lucie noted, pointing to an eager user base that could provide adoption momentum during market downturns.DeFi & Liquidity SolutionsThe fragmentation of liquidity across chains has been particularly problematic for Solana DeFi applications. Lucie suggested using Shibarium as a “DeFi layer” with “liquidity via ShibaSwap,” potentially alleviating capital efficiency problems by tapping into additional liquidity pools.Recent partnerships have strengthened Shibarium’s position as a viable expansion target. The ecosystem has formed strategic alliances with Polygon for scaling solutions, Chainlink for oracle services, and is reportedly in discussions with several other networks to enhance cross-chain functionality.Projects currently being built on Shibarium include gaming initiatives like Shiba Eternity, metaverse applications, and privacy-focused tools that could complement Solana projects seeking expanded utility.Looking toward future developments, Lucie highlighted Shibarium’s upcoming L3 solution (“Shy Mode”) focused on privacy and AI integration. For Solana projects struggling with limited privacy options, this advancement could offer significant value.“By establishing now, you’re ready when a Solana–EVM bridge is launched (inevitable),” Lucie emphasized, framing early Shibarium adoption as preparation for the increasingly multi-chain future that blockchain technology seems destined to embrace.Notably, Solana-based projects like “Shy on Sol” are already building on Shibarium, demonstrating the feasibility of maintaining presence on both networks.The post Why Solana Projects Should Consider Shibarium, According to Shiba Inu Insider appeared first on CoinCentral.

You may also like

Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?

What exactly is RaveDAO? Why is Rave able to rise so much?

1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars

Liquidity saved Polkadot's life.

After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?

The US has taken away Iran’s most important card, but has also lost the path to ending the war

Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions

The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.


There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."


Question One: Is this encryption the same as Signal's encryption?


No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.


In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.


X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.


This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.


The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.


The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.


After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."


From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.


In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.



As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."


Issue 2: Does Grok know what you're messaging in private?


Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.


For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.


This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.


There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."


Issue 3: Why is there no Android version?


X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.


In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.



WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.


X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.


These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.


Elon Musk's "Super App"


This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.



X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.


Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.


The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.


X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.


The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.


Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?

Noise is planning to launch its mainnet on Base in the coming months, at which point the platform will be open to everyone and support real-money trading.

Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x

The longer you use it, the smarter it gets, what makes Hermes, where developers have migrated to, special?

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more